求一英语辩论题目及正方一辩辩词,辩题新颖易切入（就是有话说,对词汇量的要求不高） 急如题

求一英语辩论题目及正方一辩辩词,辩题新颖易切入（就是有话说,对词汇量的要求不高） 急如题
求一英语辩论题目及正方一辩辩词,辩题新颖易切入（就是有话说,对词汇量的要求不高） 急
如题

求一英语辩论题目及正方一辩辩词,辩题新颖易切入（就是有话说,对词汇量的要求不高） 急如题
CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university has provoked controversy after local press reported that a professor asked students to design a hypothetical plan to rob a bank.The professor said the same assignment had been used at the Harvard Business School to train students how to manage human resources.
Many shocked commentators have criticized the assignment as absurd.They suggest that it may even encourage students to commit crime.Such a project wouldn't have any educational value,they argue.Others say that robbing a bank is not necessarily an innovative idea for a college class project; it only shows that the educator has run out of legitimate ideas and methods.
However,a greater number of other commentators support the project.They suggest that such unconventional methods will capture students' imaginations and make the class more interesting.
Students,too,came to the professor's defense,saying it was a very inventive project from which they learned a lot.
Do you think this is a project that should be assigned to a college class?
Yes
It won't turn students into bank robbers.There's no need to make such a fuss over it.
1.College students are adults with a well-grounded sense of right and wrong.Simply being asked by a professor to write a plan for robbing a bank isn't going to provoke them to do carry it out.
2.Not every lesson in a college class has to be about morals or social values.Academic freedom means professors can give students assignments like this,as long as they are challenging and educational.
3.The main problem with the Chinese educational system is its lack of innovation and fresh ideas.Students have been taught for decades to simply recite and repeat.This project is an example of educational innovation and should be encouraged,not criticized.
No
There are better ways to be innovative in the classroom than designing a bank robbery.
1.A bank robbery,however hypothetical,usually involves violence.Although college students probably wouldn't carry out such an act,encouraging them to plan violence is inappropriate.
2.There are better ways to stimulate students' imagination and critical thinking.The fact that the professor chose this particular case means that he is not sensitive enough to the students' real needs.
3.Just because the assignment was used at a US college doesn't mean it's suitable for a Chinese university class.Borrowing "revolutionary" educational methods from abroad without adapting them to the situation in China can lead to problems.
hypothetical假设的
innovative创新的
legitimate合理的
recite背诵

嘿嘿这种题目啊，可以有很多的方法来论
你首先看你这个题目，那些观念是人们都知道的，但是有都很模糊的，这个就是你辩论的东西。
关键的地方有3个，一个是说话，一个是量，一个要求
说话可以是很多，有日常的，有专业的。
另一个是量，什么是高，5000个，还是1万个。
还有一个是要求，要求可以很多种
这些都是有很多模糊的概念，所以不管正辩双方在辩论的时候肯定不...

全部展开

嘿嘿这种题目啊，可以有很多的方法来论
你首先看你这个题目，那些观念是人们都知道的，但是有都很模糊的，这个就是你辩论的东西。
关键的地方有3个，一个是说话，一个是量，一个要求
说话可以是很多，有日常的，有专业的。
另一个是量，什么是高，5000个，还是1万个。
还有一个是要求，要求可以很多种
这些都是有很多模糊的概念，所以不管正辩双方在辩论的时候肯定不可能离开这2个概念，都会在这3个概念上做文章。
以你一方来说
论1，日常的说话要求只需要4000个单词，相比专八，20000以上的词汇来说肯定是不多的。所以要进行日常的对话，对词汇量的要求不多。
论2，对于一个词汇而言，离不开听说读写，四个概念（也就是你说的要求），那么对于对话来说，他只需要听和说，这样的要求比起写来，低了很多，而且对于词汇量来说，我们在学英语的时候对一个词汇熟悉的过程中有很多的阶段，开始是混个眼熟，慢慢的到正确拼写，最后是熟悉运用，但是对于听说来说，很多时候知道读音，混个眼熟就可以了，所以相对正确拼写，熟悉运用的要求已经不高了。每个学英语的人都知道，自己的词汇量，肯定是前者多，后者少，在对话的过程中不需要正确的拼写，只需要记得大意和正确读音，这样的话，词汇量已经不高了。
论3，对于对话而言，本身有很多的难度，一句话有很多的说法，但是对于一般的人而言，他们不需要用复杂的词汇，复杂的句型，仅仅只要表达清楚意思就可以，对于对话而言听的明白，表达清楚，就可以，所以不需要太多的词汇。
你还可以有很多发挥，希望对你有帮助！

收起