作业帮请大家帮我解答下面这几个问题.谢谢了!the schools themselves adimit that not all children will be successfull in the jobs for which they are being trained 这句中的for可以换成in吗?为什么?并翻译句意last week only two pe
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/04/29 14:38:58
请大家帮我解答下面这几个问题.谢谢了!the schools themselves adimit that not all children will be successfull in the jobs for which they are being trained 这句中的for可以换成in吗?为什么?并翻译句意last week only two pe
请大家帮我解答下面这几个问题.谢谢了!
the schools themselves adimit that not all children will be successfull in the jobs for which they are being trained 这句中的for可以换成in吗?为什么?并翻译句意
last week only two people came to look at the house neither of whom wanted to buy it
这句中的whom可以换成who吗?这什么?
later in this chapter cases will be introuduced to readers where consumer complaints have resulted in changes in the law 请翻译这句话
the man pulled out a gold watch , the hands of which were made of small diamends请翻译这句话
all above和 above all的中文意思是一样的吗?
strangely enough 和 enough strangely 的中文意思是一样的吗?
Mr Li is the person from whom you should learn 这句中from的中文意思及为什么要用在whom前面?
the shopkeeper did'nt want to sell for what he thought was not enough 请翻译这句话
what i ever [ whatever ] i do for them 这句中括号中的whatever是代替 what i ever 吗?
请大家帮我解答下面这几个问题.谢谢了!the schools themselves adimit that not all children will be successfull in the jobs for which they are being trained 这句中的for可以换成in吗?为什么?并翻译句意last week only two pe
1.不能改.原句意思是：学校本身承认,不是所有的学生都能在他们为之训练的工作中获得成功.定语从句for which they are being trained指的是“他们为之进行培训的”,train for the job,不能说成train in the job
2.介词后不能用who代替whom
3.这一章的稍后部分将会向读者介绍消费者投诉已经造成法律上的变动的地方
4.那个人拿出一块金表,表的指针是用小钻石做的.
5.all above上面所有的,above all首先,最重要的是
6.enough应放在名词前,形容词和副词后,没有enough strangely
7.和第一题一样,是定语从句中介词+关系代词的用法.应该这样理把先行词the person放到从句中you should learn from the person,所以是from whom
8.店主不想用他认为过于低的价格卖掉货品.sell sth.for +价格,指“以某个价格卖掉某物”,同样,也有buy sth.for+价格
9.有上下文吗?这句话不完整的