问一道gmat语法题!Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action,especially if it has worked well in the past,makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.A.Heavy commitment by an executive

问一道gmat语法题!Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action,especially if it has worked well in the past,makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.A.Heavy commitment by an executive
问一道gmat语法题!
Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action,especially if it has worked well in the past,makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
A.Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action,especially if it has worried well in the past,makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
B.An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action,especially one that worked well in the past,makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
C.An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,especially if it has worked well in the past.
D.Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action,especially if it has worked well in the past,makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
E.Being heavily committed to a course of action,especially one that has worked well in the past,is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

问一道gmat语法题!Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action,especially if it has worked well in the past,makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.A.Heavy commitment by an executive
个人感觉E不仅比其他好,而且是唯一正确的选项.
这个题的主要考点在于动作和其逻辑主语的关系+代词替代这个逻辑主语的准确性.
从题干我们可以看出这句话的意思,那么可以简单分析出里面几个动作的逻辑关系如下：
if has worded well 所说的,是a course of action
使executive犯错的是因为committed to a course of action
而executive犯的错是miss signs of...或者misinterpret them(then 指代signs)
理清以上关系以后,发现：
A：makes it likely to .的逻辑主语缺失,it 无指代
B：整个句子的句意被改变,B的意思是：executive本身使得这些错误出现.
C：最后的if it has worked well里的it在逻辑上必须修饰a course of action,但是在此句里,语法上it 这里只能就近向上修饰,离本来应该修饰的太远,表意不清,指代混淆.
D：sb's -ing分词在GMAT里属于必错选项.此外,D项里最后的mesinterpreting这个-ing分词没有对应并列成分,必错
E：being 动名词做主语,表示这样1个动作,一种状态,是符合语法和逻辑的.
后面全部的逻辑关系和代词指代都清晰无误.